/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q14 E The level of monoamine oxidase (... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

The level of monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity in blood platelets (nm/mg protein/h) was determined for each individual in a sample of \(43\) chronic schizophrenics, resulting in \(\bar x = 2.69\) and \({s_1} = 2.30,\), as well as for \(45\) normal subjects, resulting in \(\bar y = 6.35\) and \({s_2} = 4.03.\). Does this data strongly suggest that true average MAO activity for normal subjects is more than twice the activity level for schizophrenics? Derive a test procedure and carry out the test using \(\alpha = .01\)

. (Hint: \({H_0}\) and \({H_a}\) here have a different form from the three standard cases. Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) refer to true average MAO activity for schizophrenics and normal subjects, respectively, and consider the parameter \(\theta = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\). Write \({H_0}\) and \({H_a}\) in terms of \(\theta \), estimate \(\theta \), and derive \({\hat \sigma _{\tilde \theta }}\) (鈥淩educed Monoamine Oxidase Activity in Blood Platelets from Schizophrenic Patients,鈥 Nature, July 28, 1972: 225鈥226).) \(\alpha = .01\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that normal people' genuine average MAO activity is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

Step by step solution

01

find mean and variance

given

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 2.69\\{{\bar x}_2} = 6.35\\{s_1} = 2.30\\{s_2} = 4.03\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 43\\{n_2} = 45\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

The sampling distribution of the sample mean \(\mu \) and standard deviation \(\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}:\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}{E\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) = {\mu _1}}\\{E\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = {\mu _2}}\\{V\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) = \frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}}}\\{V\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}}\end{array}\)

For linear combination \(W = a {X_1} + b {X_2}\) the following properties hold for the mean and variance:

\(E(W) = aE\left( {{X_1}} \right) + bE\left( {{X_1}} \right)\)

\(V(W) = {a^2}E\left( {{X_1}} \right) + {b^2}E\left( {{X_1}} \right)\left( { If {X_ - }1 and {X_ - }2} \right.\)are independent)

Let us define the statistic \(c\hat \theta = 2{\bar X_1} - {\bar X_2}\) for the parameter \(\theta = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\).

Determine its mean and variance

\(\begin{array}{l}E(\hat \theta ) = E\left( {2{{\bar X}_1} - {{\bar X}_2}} \right) = 2E\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) - E\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\\V(\hat \theta ) = V\left( {2{{\bar X}_1} - {{\bar X}_2}} \right) = {2^2}V\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) + {( - 1)^2}V\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = 4\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}\end{array}\)

The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

\({\sigma _{\hat \theta }} = \sqrt {4\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \)

02

determine probability

Because the sample sizes are high, the sampling distributions of the sample means are about normal (by the central limit theorem), and so the sampling distribution of \(\hat \theta \) is also approximately normal.

We can utilize the \(z\)-test because the samples are large \(\left( {n > 30} \right)\). (instead of a t-test).

More for the normal subjects, according to the assertion \({X_2}\).

Either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis is the assertion. The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are diametrically opposed. An equality must be present in the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\\{H_a}:2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < 0\end{array}\)

The test statistic's value is the statistic's value multiplied by its standard deviation divided by its mean:

\(z = \frac{{2{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2} - \left( {2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{4s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{2(2.69) - 6.35 - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{4 \times 2.3{0^2}}}{{43}} + \frac{{4.0{3^2}}}{{45}}} }} \approx - 1.05\)

If the null hypothesis is true, the P-value is the chance of getting a value that is more extreme or equal to the standardized test statistic \(z\). Using the usual probability table, calculate the probability.

\({\rm{P = P(Z < - 1}}{\rm{.05) = 0}}{\rm{.1469}}\)

If the p-value is smaller than the significance level \(\alpha \), then the null hypothesis is rejected.

\(P > 0.01 \Rightarrow Fail to reject {H_0}\)

There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that normal people' genuine average MAO activity is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

03

conclusion

There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that normal people' genuine average MAO activity is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

the article 鈥樷檈valuation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome鈥 (New Engl. J. of Med., \(1998:355 - 358)\) reported on an experiment in which \(120\) patients with similar clinical features were randomly divided into a control group and a treatment group, each consisting of \(60\) patients. The sample mean ICU stay (days) and sample standard deviation for the treatment group were \(19.9\) and\(39.1\), respectively, whereas these values for the control group were \(13.7\) and \(15.8\).

a) Calculate a point estimate for the difference between true average ICU stay for the treatment and control groups. Does this estimate suggest that there is a significant difference between true average stays under the two conditions?

b) Answer the question posed in part (a) by carrying out a formal test of hypotheses. Is the result different from what you conjectured in part (a)?

c)Does it appear that ICU stay for patients given the ventilation treatment is normally distributed? Explain your reasoning9. The article 鈥淓valuation of a Ventilation Strategy to Prevent Barotrauma in Patients at High Risk for

d)Estimate true average length of stay for patients given the ventilation treatment in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric condition leading to substantial weight loss among women who are fearful of becoming fat. The article "Adipose Tissue Distribution After Weight Restoration and Weight Maintenance in Women with Anorexia Nervosa" (Amer. J. of ClinicalNutr., 2009: 1132-1137) used whole-body magnetic resonance imagery to determine various tissue characteristics for both an AN sample of individuals who had undergone acute weight restoration and maintained their weight for a year and a comparable (at the outset of the study) control sample. Here is summary data on intermuscular adipose tissue (IAT; kg).

Assume that both samples were selected from normal distributions.

a. Calculate an estimate for true average IAT under the described AN protocol, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation.

b. Calculate an estimate for the difference between true average AN IAT and true average control IAT, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation. What does your estimate suggest about true average AN IAT relative to true average control IAT?

Shoveling is not exactly a high-tech activity, but it will continue to be a required task even in our information age. The article "A Shovel with a Perforated Blade Reduces Energy Expenditure Required for Digging Wet Clay" (Human Factors, 2010: 492-502) reported on an experiment in which 13 workers were each provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on stable energy expenditure ((kcal/kg(subject)//b(clay)):

Worker : 1 2 3 4

Conventional : .0011 .0014 .0018 .0022

Perforated : .0011 .0010 .0019 .0013

Worker: 5 6 7

Conventional : .0010 .0016 .0028

Perforated : .0011 .0017 .0024

Worker 8 9 10

Conventional : .0020 .0015 .0014

Perforated : .0020 .0013 .0013

Worker: 11 12 13

Conventional : .0023 .0017 .0020

Perforated : .0017 .0015 .0013

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel (the relevant normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern). Based on this interval, does it appear that the shovels differ with respect to true average energy expenditure? Explain.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of toxaphene exposure on animals, groups of rats were given toxaphene in their diet. The article "Reproduction Study of Toxaphene in the Rat" ( J. of Environ. Sci. Health, 1988: 101-126) reports weight gains (in grams) for rats given a low dose (4 ppm) and for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide. The sample standard deviation for 23 female control rats was \(32\;g\) and for 20 female low-dose rats was\(54\;g\). Does this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains? Assuming normality, carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05.

Damage to grapes from bird predation is a serious problem for grape growers. The article "'Experimental Method to Investigate and Monitor Bird Behavior and Damage to Vineyards" (Amer. \(J\). of Enology and Viticulture, 2004: 288-291) reported on an experiment involving a bird-feeder table, time-lapse video, and artificial foods. Information was collected for two different bird species at both the experimental location and at a natural vineyard setting. Consider the following data on time (sec) spent on a single visit to the location.

\(\begin{array}{l}Species Location n \overline x SEmean\\Blackbirds Exptl 65 13.4 2.05 \\Blackbirds Natural 50 9.7 1.76\\Silvereyes Exptl 34 49.4 4.78\\Silvereyes Natural 46 38.4 5.06\end{array}\)

a. Calculate an upper confidence bound for the true average time that blackbirds spend on a single visit at the experimental location.

b. Does it appear that true average time spent by blackbirds at the experimental location exceeds the true average time birds of this type spend at the natural location? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses.

c. Estimate the difference between the true average time blackbirds spend at the natural location and true average time that silvereyes spend at the natural

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.