/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q27 E Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a psych... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric condition leading to substantial weight loss among women who are fearful of becoming fat. The article "Adipose Tissue Distribution After Weight Restoration and Weight Maintenance in Women with Anorexia Nervosa" (Amer. J. of ClinicalNutr., 2009: 1132-1137) used whole-body magnetic resonance imagery to determine various tissue characteristics for both an AN sample of individuals who had undergone acute weight restoration and maintained their weight for a year and a comparable (at the outset of the study) control sample. Here is summary data on intermuscular adipose tissue (IAT; kg).

Assume that both samples were selected from normal distributions.

a. Calculate an estimate for true average IAT under the described AN protocol, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation.

b. Calculate an estimate for the difference between true average AN IAT and true average control IAT, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation. What does your estimate suggest about true average AN IAT relative to true average control IAT?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) \(\;95\% \)confidence interval: \(({\bf{0}}.{\bf{38155}},)\)

(b) \(95\% \)confidence interval: \(( - 0.0045,0.3445)\)

The confidence interval suggest that there is no difference in the true average AN IAT compared to the true average control IAT.

Step by step solution

01

a)Step 1: Find the boundaries of confident intervals

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}n = 16\\\bar x = 0.52\\s = 0.26\end{array}\)

Let us assume that we want to calculate the confidence interval with\(95\% \)confidence (other confidence levels work similarly).

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom\(df = n - 1 = 16 - 1 = 15\)and in the column with\(1 - c/2 = \)\(0.025\)in the table of the Student's T distribution:

\({t_\alpha } = 2.131\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \frac{s}{{\sqrt n }} = 2.13 \times \frac{{0.26}}{{\sqrt {16} }} \approx 0.13845\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval then become: \(\begin{array}{l}\bar x - E = 0.52 - 0.13845 = 0.38155\\\bar x + E = 0.52 + 0.13845 = 0.65845\end{array}\)

02

B)Step 2: find the end point of the confidence interval

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 0.52\\{{\bar x}_2} = 0.35\\{n_1} = 16\\{n_2} = 8\\{s_1} = 0.26\\{s_2} = 0.15\end{array}\)

Let us assume that we want to calculate the confidence interval with\(95\% \)confidence (other confidence levels work sim

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer): \(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{0.26}^2}}}{{16}} + \frac{{{{0.15}^2}}}{8}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{0.26}^2}/16} \right)}^2}}}{{16 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{0.15}^2}/8} \right)}^2}}}{{8 - 1}}}} \approx 21\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom \(df = 21\) and in the column with \(1 - c/2 = 0.025\) in the Student's \(t\) distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.080\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.080 \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{{{0.26}^2}}}{{16}} + \frac{{{{0.15}^2}}}{8}} \approx 0.1745\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (0.52 - 0.35) - 0.1745 = 0.17 - 0.1745 = - 0.0045\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (0.52 - 0.35) + 0.1745 = 0.172 + 0.1745 = 0.3445\end{array}\)

The confidence interval suggest that there is no difference in the true average AN IAT compared to the true average control IAT, because the confidence interval contains \(0\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Effect of Internal Gas Pressure on the Compression Strength of Beverage Cans and Plastic Bottles" (J. of Testing and Evaluation, \(1993: 129 - 131\)) includes the accompanying data on compression strength (lb) for a sample of\(12 - oz\)aluminum cans filled with strawberry drink and another sample filled with cola. Does the data suggest that the extra carbonation of cola results in a higher average compression strength? Base your answer on a\(P\)-value. What assumptions are necessary for your analysis?

\(\begin{array}{l}BeverageSampleSizeSampleMeanSampleSD\\Strawberrydrink1554021\\Cola1555415\end{array}\)

Teen Court is a juvenile diversion program designed to circumvent the formal processing of first-time juvenile offenders within the juvenile justice system. The article "An Experimental Evaluation of Teen Courts" (J. of Experimental Criminology, 2008: 137-163) reported on a study in which offenders were randomly assigned either to Teen Court or to the traditional Department of Juvenile Services method of processing. Of the \(56TC\) individuals, 18 subsequently recidivated (look it up!) during the 18 -month follow-up period, whereas 12 of the 51 DJS individuals did so. Does the data suggest that the true proportion of TC individuals who recidivate during the specified follow-up period differs from the proportion of DJS individuals who do so? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.10.

Recent incidents of food contamination have caused great concern among consumers. The article "How Safe Is That Chicken?" (Consumer Reports, Jan. 2010: 19-23) reported that 35 of 80 randomly selected Perdue brand broilers tested positively for either campylobacter or salmonella (or' both), the leading bacterial causes of food-borne disease, whereas 66 of 80 Tyson brand broilers tested positive.

  1. Does it appear that the true proportion of noncontaminated Perdue broilers differs from that for the Tyson brand? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level .01.
  2. If the true proportions of non-contaminated chickens for the Perdue and Tyson brands are .50 and .25, respectively, how likely is it that the null hypothesis of equal proportions will be rejected when a .01 significance level is used and the sample sizes are both 80?

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2}\)for the modified mortar \((m = 40)\) and \(\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n = 32)\). Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.6\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.4\), test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) at level . \(01.\)

b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\).

c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level \(.05\) test and wished \(\beta = .10\) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1. \). If \(m = 40\), what value of n is necessary?

d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) were unknown but \({s_1} = 1.6\)and \({s_7} = 1.4?\)

Is there any systematic tendency for part-time college faculty to hold their students to different standards than do full-time faculty? The article 鈥淎re There Instructional Differences Between Full-Time and Part-Time Faculty?鈥 (College Teaching, \(2009: 23 - 26)\) reported that for a sample of \(125 \) courses taught by fulltime faculty, the mean course \(GPA\) was \(2.7186\) and the standard deviation was \(.63342\), whereas for a sample of \(88\) courses taught by part-timers, the mean and standard deviation were \(2.8639\) and \(.49241,\) respectively. Does it appear that true average course \(GPA\) for part-time faculty differs from that for faculty teaching full-time? Test the appropriate hypotheses at significance level \( .01\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.