/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q9E Six samples of each of four type... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

Six samples of each of four types of cereal grain grown in a certain region were analyzed to determine thiamin content, resulting in the following data \((\mu g/g):\)

Wheat \(5.2\) \(4.5\) \(6.0\) \(6.1\) \(6.7\) \(5.8\)

Barley \(6.5\) \(8.0\) \(6.1\) \(7.5\) \(5.9\) \(5.6\)

Maize \(5.8\) \(4.7\) \(6.4\) \(4.9\) \(6.0\) \(5.2\)

Oats \(8.3\) \(6.1\) \(7.8\) \(7.0\) \(5.5\) \(7.2\)

Does this data suggest that at least two of the grains differ with respect to true average thiamin content? Use a level \(\alpha = .05\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

Six samples of each of four types of cereal grain grown in a certain region.

This table summarizes everything needed to carry out F teat. Here is explanation How to obtain those values.

\(I = 4\) Column-treatments

And

\(J = 6\)Row,

Reject null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level.

Step by step solution

01

definition of hypotheses

Hypotheses are typically written in the form of if/then statements, such as if someone consumes a lot of sugar, they will develop cavities in their teeth.

Given,

The data is given table.

Sample No

Wheat

Barley

Maize

oats

\(1\)

\(5.2\)

\(6.5\)

\(5.8\)

\(8.3\)

\(2\,\)

\(4.5\)

\(8\)

\(4.7\)

\(6.1\)

\(3\)

\(6\)

\(6.1\)

\(6.4\)

\(7.8\)

\(4\,\)

\(6.1\)

\(7.5\)

\(4.9\)

\(7\)

\(5\)

\(6.7\)

\(5.9\)

\(6\)

\(5.5\)

\(6\)

\(5.8\)

\(5.6\)

\(5.2\)

\(7.2\)

\({x_{i.}}\)

\(34.3\)

\(39.6\)

\(33\)

\(41.9\)

\(\overline {{x_{i.}}} \)

\(5.72\)

\(6.60\)

\(5.50\)

\(6.98\)

\(\overline {{x_{..}}} = 6.2\) \({x_{..}} = 148.8\)

This table summarizes everything needed to carry out F teat. Here is explanation How to obtain those values.

\(I = 4\) Column-treatments

And

\(J = 6\)Row,

The following table needs to be filled with corresponding values:

Source of variation

Df

Sum of squares

Mean squre

F

Treatments

\(I - 1\)

\(SSTr\)

MSTr

MSTr/MSE

Error

\(I.\left( {J - 1} \right)\)

\(SSE\)

MSE

Total

\(I\,\,.\,J - 1\)

\(SST\)

The degrees of freedom are

\(\begin{aligned}{l}I - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3\\I.\left( {J - 1} \right)4.\left( {6.1} \right) = 36\\I\,\,.\,J - 1 = 4.6 - 1 = 23\end{aligned}\)

Denote with

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{x_{i.}}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} \\{x_{..}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^J {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} } \end{aligned}\)

The total sum of squares

\(\left( {SST} \right),\)

And treatment sum of squares

\(\left( {SSTr} \right)\),

And Error sum of squares

\({\rm{ }}\left( {SSE} \right)\)are given by

\(SST = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {{x_{ij}} - \overline x ..} \right)}^2}} = } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{ij} - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}} {x^2}_{..;}} \)

\(SSTr = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_{i.}}} - \overline x ..} \right)}^2}} = \frac{1}{J}.} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{i.} - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{x^2}_{..;}} \)

\(SSE = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {{{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {\left( {{x_{ij}} - \overline {{x_{i.}}} } \right)} }^2}} .\)

The mean squares are

\(\begin{aligned}{l}MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}}.SSTr;\\MSE = \frac{1}{{I.\left( {J - 1} \right)}}.SSE.\end{aligned}\)

F is ratio of the two mean

\(F = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}}.\)

Compute all value:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{X_{1.}} = 5.2 + 4.5 + ... + 5.8 = 34.3\\{X_{2.}} = 6.5 + 8 + ... + 5.6 = 39.6\\{X_{3.}} = 5.8 + 4.7 + ... + 5.2 = 33\\{X_{4.}} = 8.3 + 6.1 + ... + 7.2 = 41.9\end{aligned}\)

Values of

\(\overline {{x_{i.}}} = \frac{1}{J}.{x_{i.}}\)

Are given by

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\overline {{x_{1.}}} = \frac{1}{6}.34.3 = 5.72\\\overline {{x_{2.}}} = \frac{1}{6}.39.6 = 6.06\\\overline {{x_{3.}}} = \frac{1}{6}.33 = 5.50\\\overline {{x_{4.}}} = \frac{1}{6}.41.9 = 6.98\end{aligned}\)

The grand mean is

\(\overline {x..} = \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,\,J}}.x.. = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij}}} = \frac{1}{{4.6}}.\left( {5.2 + 6.5 + ... + 5.2 + 7.2} \right)} \)

And

\(x.. = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij}} = } \left( {5.2 + 6.5 + ... + 5.2 + 7.2} \right)\)\( = 148.8\)

Total sum square

\(SST = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_{ij}}} . - \overline {x..} } \right)}^2}} = } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{ij}} } - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{x^2}..\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l} = \left( {{{5.2}^2} + {{6.5}^2} + ... + {{5.2}^2} + {{7.2}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{4\,.\,6}}{.148.8^2}\\ = 946.68 - 922.56\\ = 24.12\end{aligned}\)

02

The treatment sum of square

The treatment sum of square is

\(SSTr = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_i}} . - \overline {x..} } \right)}^2}} = \frac{1}{J}.} {\rm{ }}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {{x_{i.}}^2 - \frac{1}{{I - J}}{x^2}..} \)

\(\begin{aligned}{l} = \frac{1}{6}.\left( {{{34.3}^2} + {{39.6}^2} + {{33}^2} + {{41.9}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{4.\,6}}{.148.8^2}\\ = 931.54 - 922.56\\ = 8.98\end{aligned}\)

Fundamental Identify

SST = SSTr + SSE.

Error sum of squares is

\(SSE = SST - SSTr = 24.12 - 8.98 = 15.14\)

The mean computed

\(\begin{aligned}{l}MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}}.SSTr = \frac{1}{3}.8.98 = 2.99\\MSE = \frac{1}{{I\,.\left( {J - 1} \right)}}.SSE = \frac{1}{{4.\left( {6 - 1} \right)}}.15.14 = 0.757\end{aligned}\)

The value of F statistic is

\(f = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{2.99}}{{0.757}} = 3.95\)

ANOVA table now

Source of variation

Df

Sum of squares

Mean sqaure

F

Treatments

\(3\)

\(8.98\)

\(2.99\)

\(3.95\)

Error

\(20\)

\(15.14\)

\(0.757\)

Total

\(\,23\)

\(24.12\)

As for usual tests, you can either make conclusion about the hypotheses look at the F critical value or a p value. Remember that the hypotheses of interest are

\({H_0}\,:\,{\mu _i} = {\mu _j},i \ne j\,\)

versus alternative hypothesis

\({H_a}:\)at least two of the are different

The p value is the area to the right of f value under the F curve where F has Fisher's distribution with degrees of freedom \(4\) and \(30\) ; thus

\(P = P\left( {F > f} \right) = P\left( {33.95} \right) = 0.023\)

which was computed using software

\({\rm{P = 0}}{\rm{.023 < 0}}{\rm{.05 = }}\alpha \)

Reject null hypothesis at given significance level. There is no statistically significance difference in true averages among the four types of iron formation.

Using the table, you could use e.g. \({F_{0,05,3,20}}\,\)value for which the area under the curve to the right \({F_{0,05,3,20}}\,\,is\,0.05\)of. The value is

\({F_{0,05,3,30}} = 3.1 < 3.95 = f\)

And value \({F_{0,05,3,20}}\) for which the area under the F curve to the right

\({F_{0,05,3,20}} = 4.94 < 3.95 = f\)

Following holds

The p value is between \(0.01\)and\(0.05\)which indicates to reject null hypothesis

Significance level\(0.05\)

Hence,

Reject null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experiment was carried out to compare electrical resitivity for six different low-permeability concrete bridge deck mixtures. There were \(26\)measurements on concrete cylinders for each mixture; these were obtained days \(28\)after casting.The entries in the accompanying ANOVA table are based on information in the article 鈥淚n-place Resitivity of Bridge Deck Concrete Mixtures鈥(ACI Matrerials j.,2009: 114-122).Fill in the remaining entries and test appropriate hypothese.

Suppose the compression strength observation on the fourth type of box in Example \(10.1\)had been \(655.1,\,748.7,\,662.4,\,679.0,\,706.9,\,and\,640.0\) and (obtained by adding \(120\) to each previous \({x_{4j}}\)). Assuming no change in the remaining observations, carry out an F test with \(\alpha = 0.5.\)

The article 鈥渙rigin of Precambrian iron formations鈥(Econ,Geology,1964;1025-1057)reports the following data on total Fe for four types of iron formation\((1 = carbonate,\,2 = silicate,\,3 = magnetite,\,4 = hematite).\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l}1:\,\,\,20.5\,\,\,\,\,\\\,\,\,\,\,\,25.2\\2:26.3\\\,\,\,\,\,\,34.0\\3:29.5\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,26.2\\4:36.5\\\,\,\,\,\,\,33.1\end{aligned}\)\(\begin{aligned}{l}28.1\\25.3\\24.0\\17.1\\34.0\\29.9\\44.2\\34.1\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}27.8\\27.1\\26.2\\26.8\\27.5\\29.5\\34.1\\32.9\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}27.0\\20.5\\20.2\\23.7\\29.4\\30.0\\30.3\\36.3\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}28.0\\31.3\\23.7\\24.9\\27.9\\35.6\\31.4\\25.5\end{aligned}\)

Carry out analysis of variance F test at significance level \(.01,\) and summarize the results in an ANOVA table.

In Exercise \(11\) suppose \({\overline x _{3.}} = 427.5.\) now which true average spreading rates differ significantly from one another? Be sure to use the method of underscoring to illustrate your conclusion, and write a paragraph summarizing your results.

An experiment to compare the spreading rates of five brands of yellow interior latex paint available in a particular area used \(4\)gallons \(\left( {J = 4} \right)\)of each paint. The sample average spreading rates \(\left( {f{t^2}/gal} \right)\) for the five brands were \(\,{\overline x _{1.}} = 462.3,\,{\overline x _{2.}} = 512.8,\,{\overline x _{3.}} = 437.5,\,{\overline x _{4.}} = 469.3\,and\,\,{\overline x _{5.}} = 532.1\,\) the computed value of F was found to be significant at level \(\alpha = .05.\) with MSE= \(272.8\)use Tukey鈥檚 procedure to investigate significant differences in the true average spreading rates between brands.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.