/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q8E A study of the properties of men... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

A study of the properties of mental plate 鈥揷onnected trusses used for roof support (鈥淢odeling joints made with Light-Gauge metal connector plates,鈥 Forest products J., 1979:39-44) yielded the following observations on axial-stiffness index(kips/in.) for plate lengths \(4,6,8.10,12\)in:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}4:309.2\\6:402.1\\8:392.4\\10:346.7\\12:407.4\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}409.5\\347.2\\366.2\\452.9\\441.8\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}311.0\\361.0\\351.0\\461.4\\419.9\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}326.5\\404.5\\357.1\\433.1\\410.7\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}316.8\\331.0\\409.9\\410.6\\473.4\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}349.8\\348.9\\367.3\\384.2\\441.2\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}309.7\\381.7\\382.0\\362.6\\465.8\end{aligned}\)

Does variation in plate length have any effect on true average axial stiffness? state and test the relevant hypotheses using analysis of variance with Display your results in an ANOVA table.(Hint : \({\sum x ^2}_{ij.} = 5,241,420.79.)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

\(I = 5\)Column-treatments

And

\(J = 7\)Row,

which indicates to reject null hypothesis

Reject null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level.

Step by step solution

01

definition of hypotheses

Hypotheses are typically written in the form of if/then statements, such as if someone consumes a lot of sugar, they will develop cavities in their teeth.

Given,

The data given the table

Sample No.

\(4\,kips/in.\)

\(6\,kips/in.\)

\(8\,kips/in.\)

\(10\,kips/in.\)

\(12\,kips/in.\)

\(1\)

\(309.20\)

\(402.10\)

\(392.40\)

\(346.70\)

\(407.40\)

\(2\,\)

\(409.50\)

\(347.20\)

\(366.20\)

\(452.90\)

\(441.80\)

\(3\)

\(311.00\)

\(361.00\)

\(351.00\)

\(461.40\)

\(419.90\)

\(4\,\)

\(326.50\)

\(404.50\)

\(357.10\)

\(433.10\)

\(410.70\)

\(5\)

\(316.80\)

\(331.00\)

\(409.90\)

\(410.60\)

\(473.40\)

\(6\)

\(349.80\)

\(348.90\)

\(367.30\)

\(384.20\)

\(441.20\)

7

\(309.70\)

\(381.70\)

\(382.00\)

\(362.60\)

\(465.80\)

\({x_{i.}}\)

\(2332.50\)

\(2576.40\)

\(2265.90\)

\(2851.50\)

\(3060.20\)

\(\overline {{x_{i.}}} \)

\(333.21\)

\(368.06\)

\(375.13\)

\(407.6\)

\(437.17\)

\(\overline {{x_{..}}} \)=\(384.19\) \({x_{..}} = 13,446.50\)

This table summarizes everything needed to carry out F teat. Here is explanation How to obtain those values.

\(I = 5\)Column-treatments

And

\(J = 7\)Row,

The following table needs to be filled with corresponding values:

Source of variation

Df

Sum of squares

Mean sqaure

F

Treatments

\(I - 1\)

\(SSTr\)

MSTr

MSTr/MSE

Error

\(I.\left( {J - 1} \right)\)

\(SSE\)

MSE

Total

\(I\,\,.\,J - 1\)

\(SST\)

The degrees of freedom are

\(\begin{aligned}{l}I - 1 = 5 - 1 = 4\\I.\left( {J - 1} \right)5.\left( {7.1} \right) = 36\\I\,\,.\,J - 1 = 5.7 - 1 = 34\end{aligned}\)

Denote with

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{x_{i.}}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} \\{x_{..}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^J {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} } \end{aligned}\)

The total sum of squares

\(\left( {SST} \right),\)

And treatment sum of squares

\(\left( {SSTr} \right)\),

And Error sum of squares

\({\rm{ }}\left( {SSE} \right)\)are given by

\(SST = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {{x_{ij}} - \overline x ..} \right)}^2}} = } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{ij} - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}} {x^2}_{..;}} \)

\(SSTr = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_{i.}}} - \overline x ..} \right)}^2}} = \frac{1}{J}.} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{i.} - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{x^2}_{..;}} \)

\(SSE = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {{{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {\left( {{x_{ij}} - \overline {{x_{i.}}} } \right)} }^2}} .\)

The mean squares are

\(\begin{aligned}{l}MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}}.SSTr;\\MSE = \frac{1}{{I.\left( {J - 1} \right)}}.SSE.\end{aligned}\)

F is ratio of the two mean

\(F = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}}.\)

Compute all value:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{X_{1.}} = 309.20 + 409.50 + ... + 309.70 = 2332.50;\\{X_{2.}} = 402.10 + 347.20 + ... + 381.70 = 2576.40;\\{X_{3.}} = 392.40 + 366.20 + ... + 382.00 = 2625.90;\\{X_{4.}} = 346.70 + 452.90 + ... + 362.60 = 2851.50;\\{X_{5.}} = 407.40 + 441.80 + ... + 465.80 = 3060.20;\end{aligned}\)

Values of

\(\overline {{x_{i.}}} = \frac{1}{J}.{x_{i.}}\)

Are given by

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\overline {{x_{1.}}} = \frac{1}{7}.2332.50 = 333.21\\\overline {{x_{2.}}} = \frac{1}{7}.2576.40 = 368.06\\\overline {{x_{3.}}} = \frac{1}{7}.2625.90 = 375.13\\\overline {{x_{4.}}} = \frac{1}{7}.2851.50 = 407.36\\\overline {{x_{5.}}} = \frac{1}{7}.3060.20 = 437.17\end{aligned}\)

The grand mean is

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\overline {x..} = \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,\,J}}.x.. = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij}}} = \frac{1}{{5.7}}.\left( {309.20 + 409.50 + ... + 441.20 + 465.80} \right)} \\ = 384.19\end{aligned}\)

And

\(\begin{aligned}{l}x.. = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij}} = } \left( {309.20 + 409.50 + ... + 441.20 + 465.80} \right)\\ = 13,446.50\end{aligned}\)

Total sum square

\(SST = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_{ij}}} . - \overline {x..} } \right)}^2}} = } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{ij}} } - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{x^2}..\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l} = \left( {{{309.20}^2} + {{409.50}^2} + ... + {{441.20}^2} + {{465.80}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{5\,.\,7}}.13,{446.50^2}\\ = 5,241,420.79 - 5,165,953.21\\ = 75,467.58.\end{aligned}\)

02

The treatment sum of square

The treatment sum of square is

\(SSTr = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_i}} . - \overline {x..} } \right)}^2}} = \frac{1}{J}.} {\rm{ }}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {{x_{i.}}^2 - \frac{1}{{I - J}}{x^2}..} \)

\(\begin{aligned}{l} = \frac{1}{7}.\left( {{{2332.50}^2} + {{2576.40}^2} + {{2625.90}^2} + {{2851.50}^2} + {{3060.20}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{5\,.\,7}}.13,44\\ = 5,209,759 - 5,165,953.21\\ = 43,992.549.\end{aligned}\)

Fundamental Identify

SST = SSTr + SSE.

Error sum of squares is

\(SSE = SST - SSTr = 1072.256 - 509.122 = 563.134\)

The mean computed

\(\begin{aligned}{l}MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}}.SSTr = \frac{1}{7}.43,992.549 = 10,998.134\\MSE = \frac{1}{{I\,.\left( {J - 1} \right)}}.SSE = \frac{1}{{5.\left( {7 - 1} \right)}}.31,475.03 = 1049.168.\end{aligned}\)

The value of F statistic is

\(f = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{10.998.134}}{{1049.168}} = 10.483.\)

ANOVA table now

Source of variation

Df

Sum of squares

Mean sqaure

F

Treatments

\(4\)

\(43,992.596\)

\(10,998.134\)

\(10.483\)

Error

\(30\)

\(31,475.03\)

\(1049.168\)

Total

\(34\)

\(75,467.58\)

As for usual tests, you can either make conclusion about the hypotheses look at the F critical value or a p value. Remember that the hypotheses of interest are

\({H_0}\,:\,{\mu _i} = {\mu _j},i \ne j\,\)

versus alternative hypothesis

\({H_a}:\)at least two of the are different

The p value is the area to the right of f value under the F curve where F has Fisher's distribution with degrees of freedom \(4\) and \(30\) ; thus

\(P = P\left( {F > f} \right) = P\left( {F > 10.483} \right) = 0\)

\(exact:0.00001962\)

which was computed using software

\({\rm{P = 0 < }}\alpha \)

Reject null hypothesis

at given significance level. There is no statistically significance difference in true averages among the four types of iron formation.

Using the table, you could use e.g. \({F_{0,1,2,3,36}}\,\,is\,0.1\)value for which the area under the curve to the right of. The value is

\({F_{0,1,2,3,36}} = 2.142 < 10.483 = f\)

which indicates to reject null hypothesis

Reject null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level.

Hence,

Source of variation

df

Sum of squares

Mean sqaure

F

Treatments

\(4\)

\(43,992.596\)

\(10,998.134\)

\(10.483\)

Error

\(30\)

\(31,475.03\)

\(1049.168\)

Total

\(34\)

\(75,467.58\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The lumen output was determined for each of \(I = 3\)different brands of light bulbs having the same wattage, with \(J = 8\) bulbs of each brand tested. The sums of squares were computed as \(SSE = 4773.3\,and\,SS{T_r} = 591.2.\)state hypothese of intrest (including word definitions of parameters),and use the F test of ANOVA \(\left( {\alpha = .05} \right)\)to decide whether there are any differences in true average lumen outputs among the three brands for this type of bulb by obtaining as much information as possible about the p-values.

The following data refers to yield of tomatoes (kg/plot) for four different levels of salinity. Salinity level here refers to electrical conductivity (EC), where the chosen levels were EC = 1.6, 3.8, 6.0, and 10.2 nmhos/cm.

Use the F test at level\(\alpha \)=.05 to test for any differences in true average yield due to the different salinity levels.

In Exercise \(11\) suppose \({\overline x _{3.}} = 427.5.\) now which true average spreading rates differ significantly from one another? Be sure to use the method of underscoring to illustrate your conclusion, and write a paragraph summarizing your results.

The article 鈥渙rigin of Precambrian iron formations鈥(Econ,Geology,1964;1025-1057)reports the following data on total Fe for four types of iron formation\((1 = carbonate,\,2 = silicate,\,3 = magnetite,\,4 = hematite).\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l}1:\,\,\,20.5\,\,\,\,\,\\\,\,\,\,\,\,25.2\\2:26.3\\\,\,\,\,\,\,34.0\\3:29.5\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,26.2\\4:36.5\\\,\,\,\,\,\,33.1\end{aligned}\)\(\begin{aligned}{l}28.1\\25.3\\24.0\\17.1\\34.0\\29.9\\44.2\\34.1\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}27.8\\27.1\\26.2\\26.8\\27.5\\29.5\\34.1\\32.9\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}27.0\\20.5\\20.2\\23.7\\29.4\\30.0\\30.3\\36.3\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}28.0\\31.3\\23.7\\24.9\\27.9\\35.6\\31.4\\25.5\end{aligned}\)

Carry out analysis of variance F test at significance level \(.01,\) and summarize the results in an ANOVA table.

The critical flicker frequency \(\left( {cff} \right)\) is the highest frequency at which a person can detect the flicker in a flickering light source. At frequencies above the cff, the light source appear to be continuous even though it is actually flickering. An investigation carried out to see whether true average cff depends on iris color yielded the following data (based on the article 鈥淭he Effects of Iris Color on Critical Flicker Frequency鈥.

Iris color

1.Brown

2.Green

3.Blue

\({\bf{26}}.{\bf{8}}\)

\({\bf{26}}.{\bf{4}}\)

\({\bf{25}}.{\bf{7}}\)

\({\bf{27}}.{\bf{9}}\)

\({\bf{24}}.{\bf{2}}\)

\({\bf{27}}.{\bf{2}}\)

\({\bf{23}}.{\bf{7}}\)

\({\bf{28}}.{\bf{0}}\)

\({\bf{29}}.{\bf{9}}\)

\({\bf{25}}.{\bf{0}}\)

\({\bf{26}}.{\bf{9}}\)

\({\bf{28}}.{\bf{5}}\)

\({\bf{26}}.{\bf{3}}\)

\({\bf{29}}.{\bf{1}}\)

\({\bf{29}}.{\bf{4}}\)

\({\bf{24}}.{\bf{8}}\)

\({\bf{28}}.{\bf{3}}\)

\({\bf{25}}.{\bf{7}}\)

\({\bf{24}}.{\bf{5}}\)

\({J_i}\)

\({\bf{8}}\)

\({\bf{5}}\)

\({\bf{6}}\)

\({x_i}\)

\({\bf{204}}.{\bf{7}}\)

\({\bf{134}}.{\bf{6}}\)

\({\bf{169}}.{\bf{0}}\)

\({\overline x _i}\)

\({\bf{25}}.{\bf{59}}\)

\({\bf{26}}.{\bf{92}}\)

\({\bf{28}}.{\bf{17}}\)

\(n = 19,{x_{..}} = 508.3\)

  1. State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level\(.05\)(Hint:\(\sum {\sum {{x_{ij}}^2} = 13659.67,CF = 13598.36} \))
  2. Investigate difference between iris colors with respect to mean cff.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.