/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 2QQ Marge buys pizza for \(10 and Pe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

Marge buys pizza for \(10 and Pepsi for \)2. She has income of \(200. Her budget constraint will experience a parallel outward shift if.

a. the price of pizza falls to \)5, the price of Pepsi falls to \(1 and her income falls to 100.

b. the price of pizza rises to \)20, the price of Pepsi rises to \(4 and her income remains the same.

c. the price of pizza falls to \)8, the price of Pepsi falls to \(1 and her income rises to \)240.

d. the price of pizza rises to 20, the price of Pepsi rises to \(4 and her income rises to \)500.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct answer is option d) the price of pizza rises to 20, the price of Pepsi rises to $4, and her income rises to $500.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for the correct answer

When the income increases to a considerably high level and the rise in the price of other commodities don鈥檛 rise that much, it won鈥檛 much affect the individual's budget constraint. In the present scenario, the income has increased more than double, and the price of commodities hasn鈥檛 increased that much.

The price of the pizza has only risen nearly 50% and Pepsi by $2. But the income has increased more than double. So it will result in a parallel outward shift in budget constraint.

02

Explanation for incorrect options

  • In option a, there is a fall in both the income and price of commodities. So a parallel outward shift won鈥檛 occur in this case. The budget constraint will shift inside.

  • In option b, there is only a rise in the price of commodities, and income remains the same. So there is a chance of inward shift.

  • In option c, there is a fall in the price of commodities and a rise in income. But the rise in income is only minimal. So there will be an outward shift, but only to a minimum extend, but that would not be a parallel shift.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The rules of politics are not always the same as the rules of economics. In discussions of setting budgets for government agencies, there is a strategy called 鈥渃losing the Washington Monument.鈥 When an agency faces the unwelcome prospect of a budget cut, it may decide to close a high-visibility attraction enjoyed by many people (like the Washington Monument). Explain in terms of diminishing marginal utility why the Washington Monument strategy is so misleading. Hint: If you are really trying to make the best of a budget cut, should you cut the items in your budget with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility? Does the Washington Monument strategy cut the items with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility?

A person who consumes wine and cheese gets a raise, so his income increases from \(3,000 to \)4,000. Show what happens if both wine and cheese are normal goods. Now show what happens if cheese is an inferior good.

Income effects depend on the income elasticity of demand for each good that you buy. If one of the goods you buy has a negative income elasticity, that is, it is an inferior good, what must be true of the income elasticity of the other good you buy?

Bart and Lisa are both optimizing consumers in the markets for shirts and hats, where they pay \(100 for a shirt \)50 for a hat. Bart buys 8 shirts and 4 hats, while Lisa buys 6 shirts and 12 hats. From this information, we can infer that Bart鈥檚 marginal rate of substitution is ___ hats per shirt, and while Lisa鈥檚 is __.

a. 2;1

b. 2;2

c. 4;1

d. 4;2

Homer buys pizza for \(10 and Pepsi for \)2. He has income of \(100. His budget constraint will shift inward if.

a. the price of pizza rises to \)12.

b. the price of Pepsi falls to \(1

c. his income rises to \)150

d. the price of pizza, the price of Pepsi and his income all rise by 50 percent.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.