/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q48E With domestic sources of buildin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

With domestic sources of building supplies running low several years ago, roughly 60,000 homes were built with imported Chinese drywall. According to the article 鈥淩eport Links Chinese Drywall to Home Problems鈥 (New York Times, Nov. 24, 2009), federal investigators identified a strong association between chemicals in the drywall and electrical problems, and there is also strong evidence of respiratory difficulties due to the emission of hydrogen sulphide gas. An extensive examination of \(51\) homes found that \(41\) had such problems. Suppose these \(51\) were randomly sampled from the population of all homes having Chinese drywall.

a. Does the data provide strong evidence for concluding that more than \(50\% \) of all homes with Chinese drywall have electrical/environmental problems? Carry out a test of hypotheses using \(\alpha = .10\).

b. Calculate a lower confidence bound using a confidence level of \(99\% \) for the percentage of all such homes that have electrical/environmental problems.

c. If it is actually the case that \(80\% \) of all such homes have problems, how likely is it that the test of (a) would not conclude that more than \(50\% \) do?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) There isn't enough evidence to back up the allegation that the more than\(50\% \)of all home with Chinese drywall have electrical/environmental problems.

(b) The lower confidence bound is\(0.6744\).

(c) The probability is \(\beta = 0.0073 = 0.73\% \).

Step by step solution

01

Define p-value in hypothesis testing.

The null hypothesis states that the population mean is equal to the value mentioned in the claim. If the null hypothesis is the claim, then the alternative hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:p = 0\\{H_a}:p \ne 0\end{array}\)

The formula for the value of the test statistic is given by,\(z = \frac{{\hat p - {p_0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{p_0}\left( {1 - {p_0}} \right)}}{n}} }}\).

The sample proportion is calculated by dividing the number of successes by the sample size. \(\hat p = \frac{x}{n}\)

02

Test the appropriate hypothesis.

(a)

Let the given be:

\(\begin{array}{c}x = 41\\n = 51\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

Claim that the proportion is more than\(50\% \)or\(0.50\).

Sample proportion:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\hat p &= \frac{x}{n}\\ &= \frac{{41}}{{51}}\\ &\approx 0.8039\end{aligned}\)

The value of the test-statistic:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}z &= \frac{{\hat p - {p_0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{p_0}\left( {1 - {p_0}} \right)}}{n}} }}\\ &= \frac{{0.8039 - 0.50}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.50(1 - 0.50)}}{{51}}} }}\\ &\approx 4.34\end{aligned}\)

When the null hypothesis is true, the P-value is the chance of getting the test statistic's value, or a value that is more extreme. Using the normal probability table in the appendix, calculate the P-value.

\(\begin{aligned}{c}P &= P(Z > 4.34)\\ &= 1 - P(Z < 4.34)\\ &\approx 1 - 1\\ &= 0\end{aligned}\)

Since the P-value is smaller than the significance level\(\alpha \), then reject the null hypothesis:

\(P < 0.01 \Rightarrow R{\rm{eject }}{H_0}\)

There isn't enough evidence to back up the allegation that the more than \(50\% \) of all home with Chinese drywall have electrical/environmental problems.

03

Describe the margin of error.

(b)

Let\(c = 99\% = 0.99\). For confidence level\(1 - \alpha = 0.99\), determine\({z_\alpha } = {z_{0.01}}\)using the normal probability table in the appendix:\({z_\alpha } = 2.33\)

The margin of error:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E &= {z_\alpha } \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{\hat p(1 - \hat p)}}{n}} \\ &= 2.33 \times \sqrt {\frac{{0.8039(1 - 0.8039)}}{{51}}} \\ &\approx 0.1295\end{aligned}\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\hat p - E &= 0.8039 - 0.1295\\ &= 0.6744\end{aligned}\)

The lower confidence bound is \(0.6744\).

04

Determine the probability.

(c)

Let: \(\begin{array}{l}{p_A} = 80\% = 0.80\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

Using the normal probability table in the appendix, find the z-score corresponding to a probability of\(1 - \alpha = 0.99\)(Note: take the complement because the test is right-sided):

\(z = 2.33\)

The population mean (of the hypothesis) is increased by the product of the z-score and the standard deviation to get the sample mean:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\hat p &= p + z\sqrt {\frac{{p(1 - p)}}{n}} \\ &= 0.50 + 2.33\sqrt {\frac{{0.50(1 - 0.50)}}{{51}}} \\ &\approx 0.6631\end{aligned}\)

The z-value is the sample mean divided by the standard deviation, after subtracting the population mean (alternative mean).

\(\begin{aligned}{c}z &= \frac{{\hat p - {p_0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{p_0}\left( {1 - {p_0}} \right)}}{n}} }}\\ &= \frac{{0.6631 - 0.80}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.80(1 - 0.80)}}{{51}}} }}\\ &\approx - 2.44\end{aligned}\)

When the null hypothesis is false, the probability of making a type II error is the probability of not rejecting the null hypothesis. Using the normal probability table in the appendix, calculate the chances of failing to reject the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{c}\beta = P(Z < - 2.44)\\ = 0.0073\\ = 0.73\% \end{array}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The melting point of each of 16 samples of a certain brand of hydrogenated vegetable oil was determined, resulting in \(\overline x = 94.32\). Assume that the distribution of the melting point is normal with 蟽 =1.20.

a.Test H0: 碌 =95 versus Ha: 碌鈮 95 using a two -tailed level .01 test.

b.If a level .01 test is used, what is 尾(94), the probability of a type II error when 碌=94?

c.What value of n is necessary to ensure that 尾(94) = .1 when 伪 = .01?

A common characterization of obese individuals is that their body mass index is at least \(30\) (BMI 5 weighty(height)2, where height is in meters and weight is in kilograms). The article 鈥淭he Impact of Obesity on Illness Absence and Productivity in an Industrial Population of Petrochemical Workers鈥 (Annals of Epidemiology, 2008: 8鈥14) reported that in a sample of female workers, \(262\) had BMIs of less than \(25,159\) had BMIs that were at least \(25\) but less than \(30\), and \(120\) had BMIs exceeding \(30\). Is there compelling evidence for concluding that more than \(20\% \) of the individuals in the sampled population are obese? a. State and test appropriate hypotheses with a significance level of \(.05\). b. Explain in the context of this scenario what constitutes type I and II errors. c. What is the probability of not concluding that more than \(20\% \) of the population is obese when the actual percentage of obese individuals is \(25\% \)?

Reconsider the accompanying sample data on expense ratio (%) for large-cap growth mutual funds first introduced in Exercise 1.53.

\(\begin{array}{l}0.52 1.06 1.26 2.17 1.55 0.99 1.10 1.07 1.81 2.05\\0.91 0.79 1.39 0.62 1.52 1.02 1.10 1.78 1.01 1.15\end{array}\)

A normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern.

a. Is there compelling evidence for concluding that the population mean expense ratio exceeds \(1\% \)? Carry out a test of the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

b. Referring back to (a), describe in context type I and II errors and say which error you might have made in reaching your conclusion. The source from which the data was obtained reported that \(\mu = 1.33\) for the population of all \(762\) such funds. So, did you actually commit an error in reaching your conclusion?

c. Supposing that \(\sigma = .5\), determine and interpret the power of the test in (a) for the actual value of m stated in (b).

A new design for the braking system on a certain type of car has been proposed. For the current system, the true average braking distance at 40 mph under specified conditions is known to be 120 ft. It is proposed that the new design be implemented only if sample data strongly indicates a reduction in true average braking distance for the new design.

a.Define the parameter of interest and state the relevant hypotheses.

b.Suppose braking distance for the new system is normally distributed with 蟽= 10. Let \(\overline X \) denote the sample average braking distance for a random sample of 36 observations. Which values of \(\overline x \) are more contradictory to H0 than 117.2, what is the P-value in this case, and what conclusion is appropriate if 伪 = .10?

c.What is the probability that the new design is not implemented when its true average braking distance is actually 115 ft and the test from part (b) is used?

In Problems \(11 - 14\) verify that the indicated function is an explicit solution of the given differential equation. Assume an appropriate interval I of definition for each solution.

\(y'' + y = tanx; y = - (cosx) ln(secx + tanx)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.