/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q46 E Example聽\(7.11\)聽gave data on ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

Example\(7.11\)gave data on the modulus of elasticity obtained\(1\)minute after loading in a certain configuration. The cited article also gave the values of modulus of elasticity obtained\(4\)weeks after loading for the same lumber specimens. The data is presented here. \(1\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{Observation}&{1 min}&{4 weeks}&{Difference}\\1&{10,490}&{9,110}&{1380}\\2&{16,620}&{13,250}&{3370}\\3&{17,300}&{14,720}&{2580}\\4&{15,480}&{12,740}&{2740}\\5&{12,970}&{10,120}&{2850}\\6&{17,260}&{14,570}&{2690}\\7&{13,400}&{11,220}&{2180}\\8&{13,900}&{11,100}&{2800}\\9&{13,630}&{11,420}&{2210}\\{10}&{13,260}&{10,910}&{2350}\\{11}&{14,370}&{12,110}&{2260}\\{12}&{11,700}&{8,620}&{3080}\\{13}&{15,470}&{12,590}&{2880}\\{14}&{17,840}&{15,090}&{2750}\\{15}&{14,070}&{10,550}&{3520}\\{16}&{14,760}&{12,230}&{2530}\end{array}\)

Calculate and interpret an upper confidence bound for the true average difference between\(1\)-minute modulus and\(4\)-week modulus; first check the plausibility of any necessary assumptions.

Short Answer

Expert verified

\(95\% \)upper confidence bound: \(2858.5386\)

Step by step solution

01

Determine the upper confidence bound

Given:

\(n = 16\)

I will calculate a\(95\% \)upper confidence bound. Other confidence bounds can be obtained similarly.

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)Determine the sample mean of the differences. The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values.

\(\bar d = \frac{{1380 + 3370 + 2580 + \ldots + 2750 + 3520 + 2530}}{{16}} \approx 2635.625\)

Determine the sample standard deviation of the differences:

\({s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(1380 - 2635.625)}^2} + \ldots + {{(2530 - 2635.625)}^2}}}{{16 - 1}}} \approx 508.6448\)

Determine the\({t_\alpha }\)using the Student's T distribution table in the appendix with\(df = n - 1 = 16 - 1 = 15\):

\({t_\alpha } = {t_{1 - c}} = {t_{0.05}} = 1.753\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }} = 1.753 \cdot \frac{{508.6448}}{{\sqrt {16} }} \approx 222.9136\)

The upper confidence bound for\({\mu _d}\)is then:

\(\bar d + E = 2635.625 + 222.9136 = 2858.5386\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2}\)for the modified mortar \((m = 40)\) and \(\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n = 32)\). Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.6\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.4\), test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) at level . \(01.\)

b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\).

c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level \(.05\) test and wished \(\beta = .10\) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1. \). If \(m = 40\), what value of n is necessary?

d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) were unknown but \({s_1} = 1.6\)and \({s_7} = 1.4?\)

Many freeways have service (or logo) signs that give information on attractions, camping, lodging, food, and gas services prior to off-ramps. These signs typically do not provide information on distances. The article "Evaluation of Adding Distance Information to Freeway-Specific Service (Logo) Signs" \((J\). of Transp. Engr., 2011: 782-788) reported that in one investigation, six sites along Virginia interstate highways where service signs are posted were selected. For each site, crash data was obtained for a three-year period before distance information was added to the service signs and for a one-year period afterward. The number of crashes per year before and after the sign changes were as follows:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{Before:\;\;15\;26\;66\;115\;62\;64}\\{After:\;\;\;\;\;16\;24\;42\;80\;\;78\;73}\end{array}\)

a. The cited article included the statement "A paired\(t\)test was performed to determine whether there was any change in the mean number of crashes before and after the addition of distance information on the signs." Carry out such a test. (Note: The relevant normal probability plot shows a substantial linear pattern.)

b. If a seventh site were to be randomly selected among locations bearing service signs, between what values would you predict the difference in number of crashes to lie?

The accompanying summary data on total cholesterol level (mmol/l) was obtained from a sample of Asian postmenopausal women who were vegans and another sample of such women who were omnivores (鈥淰egetarianism, Bone Loss, and Vitamin D: A Longitudinal Study in Asian Vegans and Non-Vegans,鈥 European J. of Clinical Nutr., 2012: 75鈥82)

Diet sample sample sample

Size mean SD

\(\overline {\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Vegan }&{88}&{5.10}&{1.07}\\{ Omnivore }&{93}&{5.55}&{1.10}\\{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}} } \)

Calculate and interpret a \(99\% \) \(CI\) for the difference between population mean total cholesterol level for vegans and population mean total cholesterol level for omnivores (the cited article included a \(95\% \)\(CI\)). (Note: The article described a more sophisticated statistical analysis for investigating bone density loss taking into account other characteristics (鈥渃ovariates鈥) such as age, body weight, and various nutritional factors; the resulting CI included 0, suggesting no diet effect.

Refer to Example 9.7. Does the data suggest that the standard deviation of the strength distribution for fused specimens is smaller than that for not-fused specimens? Carry out a test at significance level .01.

Hexavalent chromium has been identified as an inhalation carcinogen and an air toxin of concern in a number of different locales. The article "Airborne Hexavalent Chromium in Southwestern Ontario"(J . of Air and Waste Mgmnt. Assoc., \(1997: 905 - 910\)) gave the accompanying data on both indoor and outdoor concentration (nanograms\(/{m^3}\)) for a sample of houses selected from a certain

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;\;\;\;2\;\;\;\;\;3\;\;\;\;\;\;\;4\;\;\;\;\;5\;\;\;\;\;\;\;6\;\;\;\;\;\;\;7\;\;\;\;\;\;\;8\;\;\;\;\;\;\;9}\\{Indoor\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;.07\;\;\;\;.08\;\;\;\;.09\;\;\;\;.12\;\;\;\;.12\;\;\;\;.12\;\;\;\;.13\;\;\;\;.14\;\;\;\;.15}\\{Outdoor\;\;\;\;\;\;.29\;\;\;\;.68\;\;\;\;.47\;\;\;\;.54\;\;\;\;.97\;\;\;\;.35\;\;\;\;.49\;\;\;\;.84\;\;\;\;.86}\end{array}\)

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;10\;\;\;\;\;11\;\;\;\;\;12\;\;\;\;\;13\;\;\;\;\;14\;\;\;\;\;15\;\;\;\;\;16\;\;\;\;\;17}\\{Indoor\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;.15\;\;\;\;.17\;\;\;\;.17\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.19}\\{Outdoor\;\;\;\;\;\;.28\;\;\;\;.32\;\;\;\;.32\;\;\;\;1.55\;\;\;.66\;\;\;\;.29\;\;\;\;.21\;\;\;\;1.02}\end{array}\)

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{18}&{19}&{20}&{21}&{22}&{23}&{24}&{25}\\{Indoor}&{.20}&{.22}&{.22}&{.23}&{.23}&{.25}&{.26}&{.28}\\{Outdoor}&{1.59}&{.90}&{.52}&{.12}&{.54}&{.88}&{.49}&{1.24}\end{array}\)

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{26}&{27}&{28}&{29}&{30}&{31}&{32}&{33}\\{Indoor}&{.28}&{.29}&{.34}&{.39}&{.40}&{.45}&{.54}&{.62}\\{Outdoor}&{.48}&{.27}&{.37}&{1.26}&{.70}&{.76}&{.99}&{.36}\end{array}\)

a. Calculate a confidence interval for the population mean difference between indoor and outdoor concentrations using a confidence level of\(95\% \), and interpret the resulting interval.

b. If a\(34\)th house were to be randomly selected from the population, between what values would you predict the difference in concentrations to lie?region.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.