/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q36 E Consider the accompanying data o... [FREE SOLUTION] | ÷ÈÓ°Ö±²¥

÷ÈÓ°Ö±²¥

Consider the accompanying data on breaking load (\(kg/25\;mm\)width) for various fabrics in both an unabraded condition and an abraded condition (\(^6\)The Effect of Wet Abrasive Wear on the Tensile Properties of Cotton and Polyester-Cotton Fabrics," J. Testing and Evaluation, \(\;1993:84 - 93\)). Use the paired\(t\)test, as did the authors of the cited article, to test\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{\mu _D} > 0\)at significance level . \(01\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

Do not reject null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Test statistic value for testing the hypotheses

The Paired \(t\) Test:

When \(D = X - Y\) (difference between observations within a pair), \({\mu _D} = \)\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) and null hypothesis

\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = {\Delta _0},\)

the test statistic value for testing the hypotheses is

\(t = \frac{{\bar d - {\Delta _0}}}{{{s_D}/\sqrt n }},\)

where\(\bar d\) and \({s_D}\) are the sample mean and the sample standard deviation of differences\({d_i}\), respectively. In order to use this test, assume that the differences\({D_i}\) are from a normal population. Depending on alternative hypothesis, the\(P\) value can be determined as the corresponding area under the \({t_{n - 1}}\) curve.

The hypotheses of interest are\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{\mu _D} > 0\). The following table represents the data for unabraded condition and abraded condition, as well as the difference between corresponding observed pairs: \(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}i&{{\rm{ Unabraded, }}{x_i}}&{{\rm{ Abraded, }}{y_i}}&{{\rm{ Difference, }}{d_i} = {x_i} - {y_i}}\\1&{36.4}&{28.5}&{7.9}\\2&{55}&{20}&{35}\\3&{51.5}&{46}&{5.5}\\4&{38.7}&{34.5}&{4.2}\\5&{43.2}&{36.5}&{6.7}\\6&{48.8}&{52.5}&{ - 3.7}\\7&{25.6}&{26.5}&{ - 0.9}\\8&{49.8}&{46.5}&{3.3}\\{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

02

Find the sample variance

The Sample Mean\(\bar x\)of observations\({x_1},{x_2}, \ldots ,{x_n}\)is given by

\(\bar x = \frac{{{x_1} + {x_2} + \ldots + {x_n}}}{n} = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{x_i}} \)

The sample mean\(\bar d\)for the differences is

\(\bar d = \frac{1}{8} \cdot (7.9 + 35 + \ldots + 3.3) = 7.25\)

Reminder:\({\mu _D}\)is the true average of the difference of breaking load for fabric in unabraded and abraded condition and\({\Delta _0} = 0\). The only missing value to compute the test statistic value is the sample standard deviation of differences\({d_i}\).

The Sample Variance\({s^2}\)is

\({s^2} = \frac{1}{{n - 1}} \cdot {S_{xx}}\)

Where

\({S_{xx}} = \sum {{{\left( {{x_i} - \bar x} \right)}^2}} = \sum {x_i^2} - \frac{1}{\infty } \cdot {\left( {\sum {{x_i}} } \right)^2}\)

The Sample Standard Deviation\(s\)is

\(s = \sqrt {{s^2}} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{n - 1}} \cdot {S_{xx}}} \)

The sample variance is

\(s_D^2{\rm{ }} = \frac{1}{{8 - 1}} \cdot \left( {{{(7.9 - 7.25)}^2} + {{(35 - 7.25)}^2} + \ldots + {{(3.3 - 7.25)}^2}} \right) = 140.726\)

and the sample standard deviation\({s_D} = \sqrt {140.726} = 11.8628\)

03

Find the value of P

The test statistic value is

\(t = \frac{{\bar d - {\Delta _0}}}{{{s_D}/\sqrt n }} = \frac{{7.25 - 0}}{{11.8628/\sqrt 8 }} = 1.73\)

The test is one-sided where the alternative hypothesis is\({H_a}:{\mu _D} > 0\), therefore the\(P\)value is the area under the the\({t_{n - 1}} = {t_{8 - 1}} = {t_7}\)curve to the right of\(t\)value

\(P = P(T > 1.73) = 1 - P(T \le 1.73) = 1 - 0.936 = 0.064\)

Where\(T\)has student distribution with\(7\)degrees of freedom, and the probability as computed using software (you can use table in the appendix of the book). At significance level\(0.01\), because

\(P = 0.064 > 0.01\)

do not reject null hypothesis

at given significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with ÷ÈÓ°Ö±²¥!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity \(18Ni\) maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type (Corrosion Science, 1971: 723–736). For \(m = 32\)specimens, the sample average toughness was \(\overline x = 65.6\) for the high purity steel, whereas for \(n = 38\)specimens of commercial steel \(\overline y = 59.8\). Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial purity steel by more than 5. Suppose that both toughness distributions are normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.2\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.1\), test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha = .001\).

b. Compute \(\beta \) for the test conducted in part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 6.\)

The article "Enhancement of Compressive Properties of Failed Concrete Cylinders with Polymer Impregnation" (J. of Testing and Evaluation, 1977: 333-337) reports the following data on impregnated compressive modulus (\(psi\)\( \times 1{0^6}\)) when two different polymers were used to repair cracks in failed concrete.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Epoxy }&{1.75}&{2.12}&{2.05}&{1.97}\\{ MMA prepolymer }&{1.77}&{1.59}&{1.70}&{1.69}\end{array}\)

Obtain a \(90\% \) CI for the ratio of variances by first using the method suggested in the text to obtain a general confidence interval formula.

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2}\)for the modified mortar \((m = 40)\) and \(\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n = 32)\). Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.6\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.4\), test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) at level . \(01.\)

b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\).

c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level \(.05\) test and wished \(\beta = .10\) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1. \). If \(m = 40\), what value of n is necessary?

d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) were unknown but \({s_1} = 1.6\)and \({s_7} = 1.4?\)

The article "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" cited in Exercise 7.32 reported that for a sample of 20 natural latex condoms of a certain type, the sample mean and sample standard deviation of the number of cycles to break were 4358 and 2218 , respectively, whereas a sample of 20 polyisoprene condoms gave a sample mean and sample standard deviation of 5805 and 3990 , respectively. Is there strong evidence for concluding that true average number of cycles to break for the polyisoprene condom exceeds that for the natural latex condom by more than 1000 cycles? Carry out a test using a significance level of 01 . (Note: The cited paper reported P-values of t tests for comparing means of the various types considered.)

Antipsychotic drugs are widely prescribed for conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disease. The article "Cardiometabolic Risk of SecondGeneration Antipsychotic Medications During First-Time Use in Children and Adolescents"\((J\). of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 2009) reported on body composition and metabolic changes for individuals who had taken various antipsychotic drugs for short periods of time.

a. The sample of 41 individuals who had taken aripiprazole had a mean change in total cholesterol (mg/dL) of\(3.75\), and the estimated standard error\({s_D}/\sqrt n \)was\(3.878\). Calculate a confidence interval with confidence level approximately\(95\% \)for the true average increase in total cholesterol under these circumstances (the cited article included this CI).

b. The article also reported that for a sample of 36 individuals who had taken quetiapine, the sample mean cholesterol level change and estimated standard error were\(9.05\)and\(4.256\), respectively. Making any necessary assumptions about the distribution of change in cholesterol level, does the choice of significance level impact your conclusion as to whether true average cholesterol level increases? Explain. (Note: The article included a\(P\)-value.)

c. For the sample of 45 individuals who had taken olanzapine, the article reported\(99\% CI\)as a\(95\% \)CI for true average weight gain\((kg)\). What is a $\(99\% CI\)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.