/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q22 E According to the article "Modeli... [FREE SOLUTION] | ÷ÈÓ°Ö±²¥

÷ÈÓ°Ö±²¥

According to the article "Modeling and Predicting the Effects of Submerged Arc Weldment Process Parameters on Weldment Characteristics and Shape Profiles" (J. of Engr. Manuf., \(2012: 1230 - 1240\)), the submerged arc welding (SAW) process is commonly used for joining thick plates and pipes. The heat affected zone (HAZ), a band created within the base metal during welding, was of particular interest to the investigators. Here are observations on depth\((mm)\)of the HAZ both when the current setting was high and when it was lower.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Non - high }&{1.04}&{1.15}&{1.23}&{1.69}&{1.92}\\{}&{1.98}&{2.36}&{2.49}&{2.72}&{}\\{}&{1.37}&{1.43}&{1.57}&{1.71}&{1.94}\\{ High }&{2.06}&{2.55}&{2.64}&{2.82}&{}\\{}&{1.55}&{2.02}&{2.02}&{2.05}&{2.35}\\{}&{2.57}&{2.93}&{2.94}&{2.97}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot and comment on interesting features.

b. Is it reasonable to use the two-sample \(t\) test to test hypotheses about the difference between true average HAZ depths for the two conditions?

c. Does it appear that true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of . \(01\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

a)Non-high: Roughly symmetric High: Strongly skewed.

b) Reasonable

C) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition.

Step by step solution

01

a)Step 1: To find the quartile for Non high values

Given:

Non-high (sorted):\(1.04, 1.15, 1.23, 1.37, 1.43, 1.57, 1.69, 1.71, 1.92, 1.94, 1.98, 2.06, 2.36, 2.49, 2.55, 2.64, 2.72, 2.82\)

High: \(\;1.55,{\rm{ }}2.02,{\rm{ }}2.02,{\rm{ }}2.05,{\rm{ }}2.35,{\rm{ }}2.57,{\rm{ }}2.93,{\rm{ }}2.94,{\rm{ }}2.97\)

NON HIGH

The minimum is\(1.04\).

Since the number of data values is even, the median is the average of the two middle values of the sorted data set:

\(M = {Q_2} = \frac{{19.2 + 19.4}}{2} = 1.93\)

The first quartile is the median of the data values below the median (or at\(25\% \)of the data):

\({Q_1} = 1.43\)

The third quartile is the median of the data values above the median (or at\(75\% \)of the data):

\({Q_3} = 2.49\)

The maximum is \(2.82.\)

02

To find the quartile for High values

HIGH

The minimum is\(1.55.\)

Since the number of data values is odd, the median is the middle value of the sorted data set:

\(M = {Q_2} = 2.35\)

The first quartile is the median of the data values below the median (or at\(25\% \)of the data):

\({Q_1} = \frac{{2.02 + 2.02}}{2} = 2.02\)

The third quartile is the median of the data values above the median (or at\(75\% \)of the data):

\({Q_3} = \frac{{2.93 + 2.94}}{2} = 2.935\)

The maximum is \(2.97\).

03

Plot the graph

BOXPLOT

The whiskers of the boxplot are at the minimum and maximum value. The box starts at the first quartile, ends at the third quartile and has a vertical line at the median.

The first quartile is at \(25\% \)of the sorted data list, the median at \(50\% \)and the third quartile at \(75\% .\)

Because the box of the boxplot lies to the right in between the whiskers, the distribution of "High" is severely skewed.

Because the box of the boxplot lies nearly in the middle between the whiskers and the vertical line of the median in the box of the boxplot lies roughly in the middle of the box of the boxplot, the distribution of "Non-high" is roughly symmetric.

04

b)Step 4: To find the quartile for Non high values

Given:

Non-high (sorted):\(1.04,1.15,1.23,1.37,1.43,1.57,1.69,1.71,1.92,1.94,1.98,2.06,2.36,2.49,2.55,2.64,2.72,2.82\)

High: \(1.55,2.02,2.02,2.05,2.35,2.57,2.93,2.94,2.97\)

If we want to perform a two-sample\(t\)test, then we require that both sampling distributions of the sample mean are approximately normal.

NON HIGH

We will create a normal probability plot.

The data values are on the horizontal axis and the standardized normal scores are on the vertical axis.

If the data contains \(n\)data values, then the standardized normal scores are the z-scores in the normal probability table of the appendix corresponding to an area of\(\frac{{j - 0.5}}{n}\)(or the closest area) with\(j \in \{ 1,2,3, \ldots .,n\} \).

The smallest standardized score corresponds with the smallest data value, the second smallest standardized score corresponds with the second smallest data value, and so on.

05

To find the quartile for Non high values

HIGH

We will create a normal probability plot.

The data values are on the horizontal axis and the standardized normal scores are on the vertical axis.

If the data contains\(n\)data values, then the standardized normal scores are the z-scores in the normal probability table of the appendix corresponding to an area of\(\frac{{j - 0.5}}{n}\)(or the closest area) with\(j \in \{ 1,2,3, \ldots ,n\} \).

The smallest standardized score corresponds with the smallest data value, the second smallest standardized score corresponds with the second smallest data value, and so on.

If the pattern in the normal probability plot is roughly linear and does not contain strong The population distribution is approximated normal if the pattern in the normal probability plot is generally linear and does not contain substantial curvature.

Because neither probability map has a lot of curvature and is roughly linear, both population distributions are roughly normal.

The sampling distribution of the sample mean(s) \(\bar x\) is similarly nearly normal since the population distributions are approximately normal. As a result, the two-sample test is suitable.

06

c)Step 6: Determine the standard deviation

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 18\\{n_2} = 9\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{1.04 + 1.15 + 1.23 + \ldots + 2.55 + 2.64 + 2.82}}{{18}} \approx 1.9261\\{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{1.55 + 2.02 + 2.02 + \ldots + 2.93 + 2.94 + 2.97}}{9} \approx 2.3778\end{array}\)

The variance is the sum of squared deviations from the mean divided by\(n - 1\). The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

\(\begin{array}{l}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(1.04 - 1.9261)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(2.82 - 1.9261)}^2}}}{{18 - 1}}} \approx 0.5694\\{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(1.55 - 2.3778)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(2.97 - 2.3778)}^2}}}{{9 - 1}}} \approx 0.5072\end{array}\)

Given claim: larger the the higher current condition.

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain the value mentioned in the claim.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} < {\mu _2}\end{array}\)

07

Find the test statistic

Determine the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{1.9261 - 2.3778}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{0.5694}^2}}}{{18}} + \frac{{{{0.5072}^2}}}{9}} }} \approx - 2.093\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{0.5694}^2}}}{{18}} + \frac{{{{0.5072}^2}}}{9}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{0.5694}^2}/18} \right)}^2}}}{{18 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{0.5072}^2}/9} \right)}^2}}}{{9 - 1}}}} \approx 17\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row\(df = 17\):

\(0.025 < P < 0.05\)

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

\(P > 0.01 \Rightarrow {\rm{ Fail to reject }}{H_0}\)

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with ÷ÈÓ°Ö±²¥!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Example 9.7. Does the data suggest that the standard deviation of the strength distribution for fused specimens is smaller than that for not-fused specimens? Carry out a test at significance level .01.

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of toxaphene exposure on animals, groups of rats were given toxaphene in their diet. The article "Reproduction Study of Toxaphene in the Rat" ( J. of Environ. Sci. Health, 1988: 101-126) reports weight gains (in grams) for rats given a low dose (4 ppm) and for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide. The sample standard deviation for 23 female control rats was \(32\;g\) and for 20 female low-dose rats was\(54\;g\). Does this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains? Assuming normality, carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05.

An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity \(18Ni\) maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type (Corrosion Science, 1971: 723–736). For \(m = 32\)specimens, the sample average toughness was \(\overline x = 65.6\) for the high purity steel, whereas for \(n = 38\)specimens of commercial steel \(\overline y = 59.8\). Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial purity steel by more than 5. Suppose that both toughness distributions are normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.2\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.1\), test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha = .001\).

b. Compute \(\beta \) for the test conducted in part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 6.\)

The following observations are on time (h) for a AA 1.5volt alkaline battery to reach a \(0.8\)voltage ("Comparing the Lifetimes of Two Brands of Batteries," J. of Statistical Educ., 2013, online):

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Energizer: }&{8.65}&{8.74}&{8.91}&{8.72}&{8.85}\\{ Ultracell: }&{8.76}&{8.81}&{8.81}&{8.70}&{8.73}\\{ Energizer: }&{8.52}&{8.62}&{8.68}&{8.86}&{}\\{ Ultracell: }&{8.76}&{8.68}&{8.64}&{8.79}&{}\end{array}\)

Normal probability plots support the assumption that the population distributions are normal. Does the data suggest that the variance of the Energizer population distribution differs from that of the Ultra cell population distribution? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .05. (Note: The two-sample \(t\)test for equality of population means gives a \(P - \)value of .763.) The Energizer batteries are much more expensive than the Ultra cell batteries. Would you pay the extra money?

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2}\)for the modified mortar \((m = 40)\) and \(\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n = 32)\). Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.6\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.4\), test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) at level . \(01.\)

b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\).

c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level \(.05\) test and wished \(\beta = .10\) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1. \). If \(m = 40\), what value of n is necessary?

d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) were unknown but \({s_1} = 1.6\)and \({s_7} = 1.4?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.