/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q18 E Which way of dispensing champagn... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

Which way of dispensing champagne, the traditional vertical method or a tilted beer-like pour,preserves more of the tiny gas bubbles that improve flavor and aroma? The following data was reported in the article 鈥淥n the Losses of Dissolved \(C{O_2}\) during Champagne Serving鈥 (J. Agr. Food Chem., 2010: 8768鈥8775)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Temp \left( {^^\circ C} \right)}&{ Type of Pour }&n&{ Mean (g/L)}&{ SD }\\{18}&{ Traditional }&4&{4.0}&{.5}\\{18}&{ Slanted }&4&{3.7}&{.3}\\{12}&{ Traditional }&4&{3.3}&{.2}\\{12}&{ Slanted }&4&{2.0}&{.3}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Assume that the sampled distributions are normal.

a. Carry out a test at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether true average\(C{O_2}\)loss at \(1{8^o}C\) for the traditional pour differs from that for the slanted pour.

b. Repeat the test of hypotheses suggested in (a) for the \(1{2^o}\) temperature. Is the conclusion different from that for the \(1{8^o}\) temperature? Note: The \(1{2^o}\) result was reported in the popular media

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

a)There is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{8^^\circ }C\).

b) There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{2^^\circ }C\).

Step by step solution

01

given

given

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 4.0\\{{\bar x}_2} = 3.7\\{s_1} = 0.5\\{s_2} = 0.3\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = {n_2} = 4\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

Claim differs

Either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis is the assertion. The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are diametrically opposed. The value given in the claim must be included in the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\end{array}\)

02

determine degree of freedom

determine the test static

\(t = \frac{{{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{4.0 - 3.7}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.{5^2}}}{4} + \frac{{0.{3^2}}}{4}} }} \approx 1.029\)

Determine degree of freedom

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{0.{5^2}}}{4} + \frac{{0.{3^2}}}{4}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {0.{5^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {0.{3^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}}} \approx 4\)

The P-value is the chance of getting the test statistic's result, or a number that is more severe. The P-value in the appendix containing the t-value in the row \(df = 4\) is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution:

\(P > 2 \times 0.10 = 0.20\)

The null hypothesis is rejected if the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level:

\(P > 0.01 \Rightarrow Fail to reject {H_0}\)

There is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{8^^\circ }C\).

03

b)

given

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 3.3\\{{\bar x}_2} = 2.0\\{s_1} = 0.2\\{s_2} = 0.3\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = {n_2} = 4\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

Claim differs

Either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis is the assertion. The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are diametrically opposed. The value given in the claim must be included in the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\end{array}\)

04

determine degree of freedom

determine the test static

\(t = \frac{{{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{3.3 - 2.0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.{2^2}}}{4} + \frac{{0.{3^2}}}{4}} }} \approx 7.211\)

Determine degree of freedom

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{0.{2^2}}}{4} + \frac{{0.{3^2}}}{4}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {0.{2^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {0.{3^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}}} \approx 5\)

The P-value is the chance of getting the test statistic's result, or a number that is more severe. The P-value in the appendix containing the t-value in the row \({\rm{d f = 5}}\) is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution

\(P < 2 \times 0.0005 = 0.001\)

The null hypothesis is rejected if the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level:

\(P < 0.01 \Rightarrow Reject {H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{2^^\circ }C\).

05

conclusion

a)There is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{8^^\circ }C\).

b) There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{2^^\circ }C\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The degenerative disease osteoarthritis most frequently affects weight-bearing joints such as the knee. The article "Evidence of Mechanical Load Redistribution at the Knee Joint in the Elderly When Ascending Stairs and Ramps" (Annals of Biomed. Engr., \(2008: 467 - 476\)) presented the following summary data on stance duration (ms) for samples of both older and younger adults.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{Age\;\;\;\;\;\;\;Sample Size\;\;Sample Mean\;\;Sample SD}\\{\;Older\;\;\;\;\;28\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;801\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;117}\\{Younger\;16\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;780\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;72}\end{array}\)

Assume that both stance duration distributions are normal.

a. Calculate and interpret a\(99\% \)CI for true average stance duration among elderly individuals.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level\(.05\)to decide whether true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals.

Many freeways have service (or logo) signs that give information on attractions, camping, lodging, food, and gas services prior to off-ramps. These signs typically do not provide information on distances. The article "Evaluation of Adding Distance Information to Freeway-Specific Service (Logo) Signs" \((J\). of Transp. Engr., 2011: 782-788) reported that in one investigation, six sites along Virginia interstate highways where service signs are posted were selected. For each site, crash data was obtained for a three-year period before distance information was added to the service signs and for a one-year period afterward. The number of crashes per year before and after the sign changes were as follows:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{Before:\;\;15\;26\;66\;115\;62\;64}\\{After:\;\;\;\;\;16\;24\;42\;80\;\;78\;73}\end{array}\)

a. The cited article included the statement "A paired\(t\)test was performed to determine whether there was any change in the mean number of crashes before and after the addition of distance information on the signs." Carry out such a test. (Note: The relevant normal probability plot shows a substantial linear pattern.)

b. If a seventh site were to be randomly selected among locations bearing service signs, between what values would you predict the difference in number of crashes to lie?

In medical investigations, the ratio \(\theta = {p_1}/{p_2}\)is often of more interest than the difference \({p_1} - {p_2}\)(e.g., individuals given treatment 1 are how many times as likely to recover as those given treatment\(2?)\). Let\(\hat \theta = {\hat p_1}/{\hat p_2}\). When \(m\)and n are both large, the statistic \(ln(\theta )\)has approximately a normal distribution with approximate mean value \(ln(\theta )\)and approximate standard deviation \({[(m - x)/(mx) + (n - y)/(ny)]^{1/2}}.\)

  1. Use these facts to obtain a large-sample 95 % CI formula for estimating\(ln(\theta )\), and then a CI for \(\theta \)itself.
  2. Return to the heart-attack data of Example 1.3, and calculate an interval of plausible values for \(\theta \)at the 95 % confidence level. What does this interval suggest about the efficacy of the aspirin treatment?

a. Show for the upper-tailed test with \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\)known that as either\(m\) or\(n\) increases, \(\beta \)decreases when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > {\Delta _0}\).

b. For the case of equal sample sizes \(\left( {m = n} \right)\)and fixed \(\alpha \),what happens to the necessary sample size \(n\) as \(\beta \) is decreased, where \(\beta \) is the desired type II error probability at a fixed alternative?

Recent incidents of food contamination have caused great concern among consumers. The article "How Safe Is That Chicken?" (Consumer Reports, Jan. 2010: 19-23) reported that 35 of 80 randomly selected Perdue brand broilers tested positively for either campylobacter or salmonella (or' both), the leading bacterial causes of food-borne disease, whereas 66 of 80 Tyson brand broilers tested positive.

  1. Does it appear that the true proportion of noncontaminated Perdue broilers differs from that for the Tyson brand? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level .01.
  2. If the true proportions of non-contaminated chickens for the Perdue and Tyson brands are .50 and .25, respectively, how likely is it that the null hypothesis of equal proportions will be rejected when a .01 significance level is used and the sample sizes are both 80?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.