/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q2RE Denomination Effect Construct th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

Denomination Effect Construct the confidence interval that could be used to test the claim in Exercise 1. What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion from Exercise 1?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The confidence interval to test the given claim is equal to (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175).

The presence of 0 in the confidence interval is the feature that is used to reach the conclusions.

Since the confidence interval of (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175) does not contain the value 0, there is enough evidence to support the claim that money in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to the same amount of money in smaller denominations.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of people who were given a $1 bill/4 quarters and who spent the money is tabulated along with the individual sample sizes.

02

Confidence interval

It is claimed that money in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to the same amount of money in smaller denominations.

That is, the proportion of people who receive a $1 bill and spend it is less than the proportion of people who receive 4quarters and spend the money.

The following formula is used to construct the confidence interval for estimating the difference in two population proportions:

\(CI = \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\)

Where,

  • \({\hat p_1}\)denotes the sampleproportion of people who received a $1 bill and spent it.
  • \({\hat p_2}\)denotes the sampleproportion of people who received 4 quarters and spent the money.
  • E is the margin of error.
03

Calculation

The margin of error has the following formula:

\(E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \)

The following values are obtained from the previous exercise:

\({\hat p_1} = 0.261\)

\({\hat p_2} = 0.628\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 46\\{n_2} = 43\end{array}\)

The level of significance is equal to 0.05. Thus, the corresponding confidence level is equal to 95%.

The value of\({z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\)when\(\alpha = 0.05\)is equal to 1.96.

Thus, the margin of error is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E &= {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \\ &= \left( {1.96} \right)\sqrt {\frac{{\left( {0.261} \right)\left( {1 - 0.261} \right)}}{{46}} + \frac{{\left( {0.628} \right)\left( {1 - 0.628} \right)}}{{43}}} \\ &= 0.192\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}CI &= \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\\ &= \left( {\left( {0.261 - 0.628} \right) - 0.192,\left( {0.261 - 0.628} \right) + 0.192} \right)\\ &= \left( { - 0.559, - 0.175} \right)\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the confidence interval to estimate the difference in the two proportions of people is equal to (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175).

04

Interpretation of confidence interval

If the constructed confidence interval contains the value 0, there is not enough evidence to support the given claim.

If the constructed confidence interval does not contain the value 0, there is enough evidence to support the given claim.

Thus, the property of whether the confidence interval contains 0 is used to reach the conclusions.

Here, the confidence interval of (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175) does not contain the value 0.

So, there is enough evidence to support the claim thatmoney in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to the same amount of money in smaller denominations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

Seat Belts A study of seat belt use involved children who were hospitalized after motor vehicle crashes. For a group of 123 children who were wearing seat belts, the number of days in intensive care units (ICU) has a mean of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 1.77. For a group of 290 children who were not wearing seat belts, the number of days spent in ICUs has a mean of 1.39 and a standard deviation of 3.06 (based on data from 鈥淢orbidity Among Pediatric Motor Vehicle Crash Victims: The Effectiveness of Seat Belts,鈥 by Osberg and Di Scala, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, No. 3).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that children wearing seat belts have a lower mean length of time in an ICU than the mean for children not wearing seat belts.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. What important conclusion do the results suggest?

Heights of PresidentsA popular theory is that presidential candidates have an advantage if they are taller than their main opponents. Listed are heights (cm) of presidents along with the heights of their main opponents (from Data Set 15 鈥淧residents鈥).

a.Use the sample data with a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that for the population of heights of presidents and their main opponents, the differences have a mean greater than 0 cm.

b.Construct the confidence interval that could be used for the hypothesis test described in part (a). What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion reached in part (a)?

Height (cm) of President

185

178

175

183

193

173

Height (cm) of Main Opponent

171

180

173

175

188

178

Determining Sample Size The sample size needed to estimate the difference between two population proportions to within a margin of error E with a confidence level of 1 - a can be found by using the following expression:

E=z2p1q1n1+p2q2n2

Replace n1andn2 by n in the preceding formula (assuming that both samples have the same size) and replace each of role="math" localid="1649424190272" p1,q1,p2andq2by 0.5 (because their values are not known). Solving for n results in this expression:

n=z222E2

Use this expression to find the size of each sample if you want to estimate the difference between the proportions of men and women who own smartphones. Assume that you want 95% confidence that your error is no more than 0.03.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim

Question:Headache Treatment In a study of treatments for very painful 鈥渃luster鈥 headaches, 150 patients were treated with oxygen and 148 other patients were given a placebo consisting of ordinary air. Among the 150 patients in the oxygen treatment group, 116 were free from head- aches 15 minutes after treatment. Among the 148 patients given the placebo, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment (based on data from 鈥淗igh-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache,鈥 by Cohen, Burns, and Goads by, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 302, No. 22). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, is the oxygen treatment effective?

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from 鈥淏ipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,鈥 by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.