/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11-2-16BSC A case-control (or retrospective... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

A case-control (or retrospective) study was conductedto investigate a relationship between the colors of helmets worn by motorcycle drivers andwhether they are injured or killed in a crash. Results are given in the table below (based on datafrom 鈥淢otorcycle Rider Conspicuity and Crash Related Injury: Case-Control Study,鈥 by Wellset al., BMJ USA,Vol. 4). Test the claim that injuries are independent of helmet color. Shouldmotorcycle drivers choose helmets with a particular color? If so, which color appears best?

Color of helmet


Black

White

Yellow/Orange

Red

Blue

Controls (not injured)

491

377

31

170

55

Cases (injured or killed)

213

112

8

70

26

Short Answer

Expert verified

Injuries are dependent on helmet color.

The proportion of the subjects that were not injured was least when the subjects wore blue color.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Data for relationship between the colors of helmets worn by motorcycle drivers and their injuries or deaths in crashes.

02

Check the requirements of the test

Theexpected frequency formulais,

\(E = \frac{{\left( {row\;total} \right)\left( {column\;total} \right)}}{{\left( {grand\;total} \right)}}\)

The observation table with row and column total is,


Black

White

Yellow/Orange

Red

Blue

Row total

Controls(not injured)

491

377

31

170

55

1124

Cases(injured or killed)

213

112

8

70

26

429

Column Total

704

489

39

240

81

1553

Theexpected frequency tableis represented as,


Black

White

Yellow/

Orange

Red

Blue

Controls (not injured)

509.5274

353.9189

28.2267

173.7025

58.6246

Cases (injured or killed)

194.4726

135.0811

10.7733

66.2975

22.3754

Assume the experimental units are randomly selected.

The expected frequencies are greater than 5.

Thus, the requirements of the test are satisfied.

03

Formulate the hypotheses

The hypotheses are formulated as follows:

\({H_0}:\)Injuries are independent of helmet color.

\({H_1}:\)Injuries are dependent on helmet color.

04

Compute the test statistic

The value of the test statisticis computed as,

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = \frac{{{{\left( {491 - 509.5274} \right)}^2}}}{{509.5274}} + \frac{{{{\left( {377 - 353.9189} \right)}^2}}}{{353.9189}} + ... + \frac{{{{\left( {26 - 22.3754} \right)}^2}}}{{22.3754}}\\ = 9.971\end{aligned}\]

Therefore, the value of the test statistic is 9.971.

05

Compute the degrees of freedom

The degrees of freedomare computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\left( {r - 1} \right)\left( {c - 1} \right) = \left( {2 - 1} \right)\left( {5 - 1} \right)\\ = 4\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the degrees of freedom are 4.

06

Compute the critical value

From the chi-square table, the critical value corresponding to 4 degrees of freedom and at 0.05 level of significance 9.488.

Therefore, the critical value is 9.488.

The p-value is obtained as 0.041.

07

State the decision

Since the critical value (9.488) is less than the value of the test statistic (9.971). In this case, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

08

State the conclusion

There isinsufficient evidence to support the claim that Injuries are independent of helmet color.

Thus, the helmet color is dependent on the injuries.

Therefore, the motocycle drivers must choose a particular color to avoid injuries. From the sample data, the proportion of least controls (not injured) under each of the color categories is:


Black

White

Yellow/Orange

Red

Blue

Controls(not injured)

0.6974\(\left( {\frac{{491}}{{704}}} \right)\)

0.7710

\(\left( {\frac{{377}}{{489}}} \right)\)

0.7949

\(\left( {\frac{{31}}{{39}}} \right)\)

0.7083

\(\left( {\frac{{170}}{{240}}} \right)\)

0.6790

\(\left( {\frac{{55}}{{81}}} \right)\)

Thus, lowest proportion of no injuries occurred when subjects wore blue helmets.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table below includes results from polygraph (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers Charles R. Honts (Boise State University) and Gordon H. Barland (Department of Defense Polygraph Institute). In each case, it was known if the subject lied or did not lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truths and lies?

Did the subject Actually Lie?


No (Did Not Lie)

Yes (Lied)

Polygraph test indicates that the subject lied.


15

42

Polygraph test indicates that the subject did not lied.


32

9

Do World War II Bomb Hits Fit a Poisson Distribution? In analyzing hits by V-1 buzz bombs in World War II, South London was subdivided into regions, each with an area of 0.25\(k{m^2}\). Shown below is a table of actual frequencies of hits and the frequencies expected with the Poisson distribution. (The Poisson distribution is described in Section 5-3.) Use the values listed and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual frequencies fit a Poisson distribution. Does the result prove that the data conform to the Poisson distribution?

Number of Bomb Hits

0

1

2

3

4

Actual Number of Regions

229

211

93

35

8

Expected Number of Regions

(from Poisson Distribution)

227.5

211.4

97.9

30.5

8.7

In Exercises 5鈥20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and, or critical value, and state the conclusion.

Kentucky Derby The table below lists the frequency of wins for different post positions through the 141st running of the Kentucky Derby horse race. A post position of 1 is closest to the inside rail, so the horse in that position has the shortest distance to run. (Because the number of horses varies from year to year, only the first 10 post positions are included.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse racing in the Kentucky Derby?

Post Position

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Wins

19

14

11

15

15

7

8

12

5

11

Loaded Die The author drilled a hole in a die and filled it with a lead weight, then proceeded to roll it 200 times. Here are the observed frequencies for the outcomes of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively: 27, 31, 42, 40, 28, and 32. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the outcomes are not equally likely. Does it appear that the loaded die behaves differently than a fair die?

Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Benford鈥檚 law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21鈥24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Author鈥檚 Check Amounts Exercise 21 lists the observed frequencies of leading digits from amounts on checks from seven suspect companies. Here are the observed frequencies of the leading digits from the amounts on the most recent checks written by the author at the time this exercise was created: 83, 58, 27, 21, 21, 21, 6, 4, 9. (Those observed frequencies correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively.) Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that these leading digits are from a population of leading digits that conform to Benford鈥檚 law. Does the conclusion change if the significance level is 0.05?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.