/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q6. Consider a specific example of t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 魅影直播

魅影直播

Consider a specific example of the special-interest effect and the collective-action problem. In 2012, it was estimated that the total value of all corn-production subsidies in the United States was about \(3 billion. The population of the United States was approximately 300 million people that year.

a. On average, how much did corn subsidies cost per person in the United States in 2012? (Hint: A billion is a 1 followed by nine zeros. A million is a 1 followed by six zeros.)

b. If each person in the United States is willing to spend only \)0.50 to support efforts to overturn the corn subsidy, and if anti-subsidy advocates can only raise funds from 10 percent of the population, how much money will they be able to raise for their lobbying efforts?

c. If the recipients of corn subsidies donate just 1 percent of the total amount that they receive in subsidies, how much could they raise to support lobbying efforts to continue the corn subsidy?

d. By how many dollars does the amount raised by the recipients of the corn subsidy exceed the amount raised by the opponents of the corn subsidy?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The cost of corn subsidies per person is $10.

  2. The total money raised for lobbying efforts against the corn subsidy provision is $15million.

  3. The money raised for lobbying efforts favoring corn subsidy provision is $30 million.

  4. Lobbying fund amount raised by recipients exceeds the amount raised by opponents of corn subsidy by $15 million.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The average amount of corn subsidies are calculated by finding the ratio of total subsides by the population size. Thus, with a population of 300 million people and $3 billion of total corn-production subsidies, the cost of corn subsidies per person would be $10, as shown below:Cornsubsidiesperperson=TotalcornsubsidiesTotalpop[ulation=3,000,000,000300,000,000=$10

02

Explanation for part (b)

The total money raised for anti-subsidy lobbying activities/efforts is calculated by finding the product of the willingness to spend per person to over-turn corn subsidy policy and the portion of the population that supports anti-subsidy policy or lobbying efforts, as shown below:Totalfunds=MoneyraisedfromasinglepersonTotalpeoplewhogavemoney=0.5010%of300million=0.500.10300,000,000=$15,000,000

Thus, the total money raised by opponents to stop corn-production subsidies and to fund the respective lobbying efforts is $15 million.

03

Explanation for part (c)

The total money raised for lobbying activities/efforts in favor of providing subsidies is one percent of the total subsidies received by the recipients.Totalfunds=1%of3billion=0.013,000,000,000=$30,000,000

Thus, the total money raised by recipients to continue the corn-production subsidies and to fund the respective lobbying efforts is $30 million.

04

Explanation for part (d)

The recipients of corn subsidies raised $30 million funds, whereas the opponents of the corn subsidy raised $ 15 million. Thus, the recipients raised $15 million more than the opponents (=30-15).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 魅影直播!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does traditional one-person-one-vote (1p1v) majority voting allow voters to directly express differences in strengths of preference? Does quadratic voting do any better? Discuss the differences and then explain which system you prefer, and why.

Look back at Figures 5.2a and 5.2b, which show the costs and benefits to voters Garcia, Johnson, and Lee of two different public goods that the government will produce if a majority of voters support them. Suppose that Garcia, Johnson, and Lee have decided to have one single vote at which the funding for both of those public goods will be decided simultaneously.

a. Given the $300 cost per person of each public good, what are Garcia鈥檚 net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will she vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously?

b. What are Lee鈥檚 net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will she vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously?

c. What are Johnson鈥檚 net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will he vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously鈥攐r will he be indifferent?

d. Who is the median voter here? Whom will the two other voters be attempting to persuade?

Critique: 鈥淭hank goodness we have so many government regulatory agencies. They keep Big Business in check.鈥

Jean-Baptiste Colbert was the Minister of Finance under King Louis XIV of France. He famously observed, "The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers with the smallest possible amount of hissing." How does his comment relate to the special-interest effect?

Consider a corrupt provincial government in which each housing inspector examines two newly built structures each week. All the builders in the province are unethical and want to increase their profits by using substandard construction materials, but they can鈥檛 do that unless they can bribe a housing inspector into approving a substandard building.

a. If bribes cost \(1,000 each, how much will a housing inspector make each year in bribes? (Assume that each inspector works 52 weeks a year and gets bribed for every house he or she inspects.)

b. There is a provincial construction supervisor who gets to hire all of the housing inspectors. He himself is corrupt and expects his housing inspectors to share their bribes with him. Suppose that 20 inspectors work for him and that each passes along half the bribes collected from builders. How much will the construction supervisor collect each year?

c. Corrupt officials may have an incentive to reduce the provision of government services to help line their own pockets. Suppose that the provincial construction supervisor decides to cut the total number of housing inspectors from 20 to 10 in order to decrease the supply of new housing permits. This decrease in the supply of permits raises the equilibrium bribe from \)1,000 to \(2,500. How much per year will the construction supervisor now receive if he is still getting half of all the bribes collected by the 10 inspectors? How much more is the construction supervisor getting now than when he had 20 inspectors working in part b? Will he personally be happy with the reduction in government services?

d. What would happen if reducing the number of inspectors from 20 to 10 only increased the equilibrium bribe from \)1,000 to $1,500? In this case, how much per year would the construction supervisor collect from his 10 inspectors? How much less is the construction supervisor getting than when he had 20 inspectors working in part b? In this case, will the construction supervisor be happy with the reduction in government services? Will he want to go back to using 20 inspectors?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.